Tattoos. Some of you like them, some do not mind, but many of you hate them so much, that it’s practically an instant turn-off for you. We personally have nothing against tattoos, if they have a deeper meaning or an artistic value.
Johnny Torque has always been our favorite performer. He’s handsome, has nice lean body, but we’ve always had some doubts about his ‘stars’ tattoos. So we’ve decided to do him a little makeunder to see how would he look like without any tattoos.
Loading ...
he’s gross in general
Oh, they have “deeper meaning” all right.
In mid 19th century America, they signified southern plantation owners’ property rights to people the U.S. Constitution defined as “3/5 of a human being.” In early-mid 20th century Europe, they designated Jews, queers, disabled and others not considered members of the master race as eligible for elimination at the death camps.
In short, body ink has always defined human beings as owned by something — ideas, human beings, perhaps the earth itself. I am a radical individualist and consider myself owned by nobody and nothing. Excepts, perhaps, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, upon my baptism. And, that left no mark. I remain as unspoiled as the day I was born.
Johnny Torque — as well as every human on the planet alive or resting in eternal peace — looks infinitely better without any evidence of self-mutilation.
hid·e·ous
Hi,
Do you accept exchange link with my blog ” L’Homme Est Un Concept ” ?
Regards
Thierry from Paris
My instant turn-off is guys with no bush whatsoever. Just stop it already!
Sorry Nuno,
A hairless dude from neck to balls is something else…!