Question: Porn or Art?
I found this interesting picture. It’s something between art and porn. What do you think?
ABOUT
ADVERTISING
Real guys available to chat!
SOCIAL
We Love Nudes | All media and photos are owned by their respective owners. | This site contains images of naked men and men engaging in sex acts. Access is limited to ADULTS ONLY. Please leave if you are under the age of 18. Contact us.
Its so fcking hot!!
P-Art maybe
I think it leans more towards the art side. If it was a pornographic picture, why cover the goods and hide his face/body. I’m not outright saying it’s art, just that it leans more to that side.
Why does it have to be one or the other?
If art is the expression of the human condition, expression, and experience; pornography, which is simply the manifestation of sexual expression for the sake of sexual arousal, is surely art. Of course not all art is valued the same, but it’s still art, like the picture.
Let me put it this way: I’d fuck this guy’s hole silly, and then frame the picture for my wall.
Art is in the eye of whoever is looking at it. For some this would be just porn – someone else it could be art.
It doesn’t do either for me.
Porn IS Art.
Well, when done correctly, this pic can be both, because then porn is a form of art.
Although, I may be a bit biased when it comes to this pic, because I used it in a blog entry for my “Getting Out The Kinks” series called, “Step To Me – WET!”
http://tre-x.com/blog/?p=175
And I used it because it’s a VERY HOT pic that helps to explain my point.
Porn
porn, art -if I had to put a label on it I’d go with porn. Nothing wrong with porn, love it. But Ruben, I don’t think it is so much he’s covering his cock as he’s gettin ready to put one of those fingers up his ass and go to town.
just my thoughts
BHcolin
It’s freaking hot….
I’m torn between porn and art. because it’s pornographic, but shot artistic!
Wow!! I love this shot….It’s both porn and art…interelated I guess….either I don’t care… This shot is deliciously addictive!! crazy! any more?
I want to see him put his fingers inside..yum!
Porn.
It's porn ;)
sorry .. <3
- MaGa-Wall
its porn!
The guy in this picture is JD Amos. This picture is the copyright of Colt Studios, when it was owned by Rip Colt aka Jim French. Rip Colt himself did the photography of his models. Although Colt Studios is considered gay porn, anyone who’s familiar with Colt Studios when it was under Rip Colt or is a fan of Colt Studios basically seen Rip’s photography as gay art or at least porn with a more artistic feel….
I’d say it is art…
Uh could we move onto something else?
Well, a basic study of art history would say ‘depends’… Dadaism showed us that context is everything when it comes to an object (or photograph in this case) is art or not… this pic in a gallery = art… this pix on a porn site = porn…
Anonymous above can certainly move onto something else (there are scads of blogs out there) ;-)
Boring me!!
nice
Art, like beauty, has always been in the eye of the beholder. It’s a subjective judgment based on one’s personal ideas and aesthetic preferences.
Porn, duh.
regardless of it has any artistic merit – one man's art is another man's garbage – this picture is incredibly for porn standards…
Porn is, sexual arts???????
very sweet hole, for fucking, but is art
It is Porn-art :-)))
and I love it !!!
porn
its porn and art its P-ART!
Art? I guess I’d hang it on the wall but it doesn’t match my sofa.
I’m a professional artist and deal with galleries in NY and across the country. This question is brought up a lot. Hard to answer because it is subjective. Sometimes the answer depends on where the picture is shown – on porn website or in a gallery with other works by an artist that are not as ‘pornographic.” The latter might be considered art. As is, I think most artists who don’t mind erotic content would consider this picture to still be porn, meant mainly for erotic pleasure. Personally, I love the pic and men like this. It still is mainly erotic to me. If the person who made it believe it is art, is it art to him/her.
The Courts have determined pornography to be any visual representation of penetration. By that legal definition it is not porn in spite of its sexual and sensual nature.
The photo is awfully suggestive to be considered art. If I were to see the photo somewhere else, I’d call it porn
Last year, I remember going to a small photo exhibition in Paris showcasing nude male photography. In fact, there were a few color photos of gay porn stars among all the “tasteful” B&W images. I found that interesting. Whoever put together the exhibition obviously felt that those “porn” pics (the dudes were hot, hung, and hard) were artful in their own way. Then, looking at the other “tasteful” photos, I found I felt the same sexual desire as I did looking at the “porn” pics. I began to see his reasoning.
awesome its art
please contact me…
crayative
Porn. There is nothing in that picture that comes even close to artistic.
Hey there, You’ve done a great job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am confident they’ll be benefited from this site. I am not sure where you’re getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for great info I was looking for this information for my mission.
Best regards
it’s art ofcorse
Place it bathroom, so u can answer that
none of the two, it would fall under erotica in my books
porns artist
It’s the art of porn,