[Then & Now] Rod Daily

24 CommentsQuestion,Then-Now Model: 04 Jan 2010

Well, Rod Daily is a hunk, no doubts, but not everyone is fan of his Tattoos. So, how would he look without them?
How do You like Rod more? With or without Tattoos?
Your thoughts?

24 Comments »

    Andrew J.

    It’s hard to tell, I like both images :D

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    kevin

    not a fan of ink

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    ron

    Without tats

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    DLH

    Definitely WITHOUY!!!!!

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    art

    I don’t mind *good* tattoos, but in this case: without the tattoos is way better.

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    FLguy

    Unquestionably without any tattoos!

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Tom

    Definitely without tats.

    Comment | January 4, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    BBear

    Not a fan of ink. Mainly folks don’t know when enough is enough and they cross the line from hot to circus side show. Give me an un-adulterated (by ink) body any time.

    Comment | January 5, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    nickie

    How did you get the “without” one? I like him better this way. He is a gorgeous bottom anyway. Mouth-watering :)

    Comment | January 5, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    admin

    I photoshopped it :D

    Comment | January 5, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Itasca

    Subtle, tastefull tatoos are fine, but these are trashy and overpowering. Such a beautiful, finely honed body wrecked by those huge, unartfull tats. Reminds me of how Michael Churchill ruined his nearly perfect body with his tatoos. Such a pity.

    Comment | January 5, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    josh

    who cares about the tattos. if this hunk was in my bed on top of me the last thing on my mind would be the tattoos

    Comment | January 6, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Anonymous

    without..
    Trashy with.

    Comment | January 6, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Blaylock

    Without the tats. Guys don’t seem to mind ruining the great artwork that is their beautiful bodies with those things. One or two tasteful ones don’t bother me but blue stars make you look more like a He-Man reject figure.

    Comment | January 7, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Jo

    Whithout !!!

    Comment | January 7, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Peter

    Without he looks much better!! I’m not a fan of ink.

    Comment | January 8, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    mark

    without

    Comment | January 11, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    uncal

    Definitely without!!!!!!!!!

    Comment | January 21, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    brihova

    Definitely WITH!!!!! Who are these old fuddy duddies who can’t take a couple of tats.

    Comment | April 20, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Michael

    I like him with tattoos better

    Comment | May 19, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    BiggerAl

    Without!!! How can anybody improve on what he already has?

    Comment | July 28, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    robin1d

    he looks better without, but his beautiful muscular body can have one or two. I like the one on his right flank though, but his pecs are hotter without the stars…;)

    Comment | August 5, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Ed

    Definitely with out,The stud has a HOT bod,He should remove them, would be HOT to watch Rod in a black gang bang. Set it up Chi Chi!

    Comment | August 6, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    Tyler

    You are so amazingly hot i wish i had the chance to do something with you. i love the tats i hate tats but you just look so good

    Comment | August 8, 2010 Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Logged in as . Logout »
We Love Nudes | All media and photos are owned by their respective owners. | This site contains images of naked men and men engaging in sex acts. Access is limited to ADULTS ONLY. Please leave if you are under the age of 18. Contact us.